Click, Connect, Heal? Digital Determinants and the Future of Equitable Care


 In today’s rapidly evolving healthcare world, it feels as though technology is weaving itself into every part of our daily routines. From tracking sleep habits on our smartwatches to connecting with doctors over a video call, our digital tools are reshaping the way we approach wellness. But this shift is about more than just convenience; it’s also about recognizing how digital resources (or the lack of them) can shape health outcomes just as significantly as traditional social determinants like income, education, or neighborhood conditions. These “digital determinants of health” are now a critical piece of the conversation about health equity, personalization, and modern patient care.

Understanding Digital Determinants of Health

The notion of digital determinants of health refers to the factors influencing whether people can access, understand, and benefit from digital technologies designed to keep them healthy. While many of us are fortunate enough to have reliable internet, a smart device, and digital literacy, others face challenges such as spotty internet, older or incompatible devices, or limited tech knowledge. These barriers can prevent entire communities from accessing telemedicine services, online patient portals, or remote monitoring solutions, which have become more prevalent in the rise of public health problems and an increasingly mobile society (1).

On top of these practical hurdles, it’s clear that health outcomes also rely on digital literacy, the ability to navigate telehealth appointments, interpret data from wearable devices, and understand app-based treatment instructions (2). When digital innovations aren’t designed with diverse users in mind, including older adults or people from underserved communities, these tools can accidentally widen existing gaps in care. Such gaps reflect a growing need for technology development that prioritizes inclusivity, patient education, and thoughtful design.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1490156

Shifting Toward Telemedicine

Telemedicine, once viewed as a futuristic option, is now a mainstay of patient care. Virtual consultations allow individuals to see their primary care physicians or specialists using secure video platforms, cutting down travel burdens and expanding access to people in rural or remote areas (3). This approach also helps reduce the time people spend waiting for clinical appointments, making it easier to catch health problems early.

Despite its promise, telemedicine still faces challenges. Reliable internet access, user-friendly platforms, and basic knowledge of technology are crucial for productive telemedicine. Unsurprisingly, certain populations, such as those in lower socioeconomic groups or with limited English proficiency, may face difficulties getting the full benefit of telemedicine solutions (4). By recognizing these digital determinants upfront, healthcare providers and policymakers can tailor telemedicine initiatives to serve the widest possible audience.

Wearables and Remote Patient Monitoring

Wearable devices like activity trackers, continuous glucose monitors, or smart heart-rate sensors have introduced new possibilities for personalized care. These devices give patients and clinicians round-the-clock insights into vital signs, activity levels, and stress patterns, making it easier to adjust treatments in real time (5). The ability to gather such continuous and detailed data has the potential to transform chronic disease management for conditions like diabetes, hypertension, or heart failure.

However, the success of wearable technology relies on a patient’s ability to purchase and maintain the device, as well as interpret and act on the collected information. When cost or digital fluency stand in the way, wearables become yet another privilege only some patients enjoy. This imbalance raises essential questions about how we can embed these technologies into broader public health strategies, ensuring that they make a difference to communities with the greatest need.

AI and Clinical Decision Support

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is subtly and spectacularly revolutionizing healthcare. Whether through AI-driven clinical decision support systems or predictive analytics to forecast patient risk, these tools promise to simplify a physician’s workload and refine how we detect illnesses (6). For instance, advanced algorithms can scan imaging studies to spot cancerous growths earlier than a clinician might, potentially leading to improved outcomes and lower costs.

Yet, AI-based decisions can produce inequities if the data set used by these algorithms is incomplete or skewed toward specific patient populations. Bias in training data can lead to misdiagnoses or overlooked illnesses in groups that have historically been underrepresented in healthcare research (7). Furthermore, patients need a certain level of digital literacy to fully gain AI’s benefits, whether understanding how AI recommendations are generated or trusting AI solutions enough to follow their guidance.

Digital Therapeutics for Long-Term Management

Beyond diagnosis and teleconsultations, digital therapeutics (DTx) offer treatments delivered through apps or software-based programs. These interventions help with mental health conditions, addiction, cardiovascular disease, and more (8). They often blend behavior therapy with remote coaching, allowing patients to engage with care on a schedule that fits their daily lives.

At their best, digital therapeutics offer a more convenient way to manage chronic conditions, freeing individuals from repeated office visits. However, people lacking consistent internet or device access might not be able to complete an app’s requirements or check in with health coaches regularly. Thus, digital determinants of health can directly affect a person’s ability to sustain lifestyle changes and follow recommended treatment plans.

Bridging the Divide: A Path Forward

  • Prioritize Inclusive Design: Developers should collaborate with patients from all backgrounds to create intuitive, language-accessible interfaces that are mindful of limited digital literacy. By making design choices that cater to different abilities and experiences, digital tools can better serve the entire patient population.
  • Boost Digital Literacy Efforts: Health systems and community organizations can hold workshops to teach basic tech skills, such as navigating patient portals or using telemedicine platforms. This will boost engagement and build confidence in patients who might otherwise feel hesitant about digital care.
  • Improve Internet Connectivity: Governments and private sectors can invest in expanding broadband infrastructure in rural and underserved regions. Without reliable internet, even the most advanced telehealth platforms won’t help those needing them most.
  • Strengthen Interoperability: Data should flow seamlessly between devices, apps, and electronic health record (EHR) systems while protected by robust security. Streamlining information exchange saves time, curbs duplication, and helps each clinician see the broader picture of a patient’s health.
  • Address Potential Biases: With AI and big data at the forefront, continuous review of algorithms and data inputs can catch biases. Diversifying the data used to train AI systems will make healthcare more equitable, ensuring that recommendations apply to a wide range of patients.

Conclusion

The digital determinants of health represent the next frontier in the ongoing effort to deliver equitable, person-centered care. While technology holds immense promise in bringing healthcare into our homes and personal devices, it also risks leaving behind the most vulnerable among us. By intentionally designing digital tools that account for people’s varied backgrounds and situations, we can offer the full power of telemedicine, wearable devices, AI, and digital therapeutics to improve everyone's quality of life. Ultimately, when we take digital determinants seriously, we ensure that the future of healthcare is innovative and inclusive.


References

  1. Crawford A, Serhal E. Digital Health Equity and COVID-19: The Innovation Curve Cannot Reinforce the Social Gradient of Health. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(6):e19361. doi:10.2196/19361
  2. Veinot TC, Mitchell H, Ancker JS. Good intentions are not enough: how informatics interventions can worsen inequality. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018;25(8):1080-1088. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocy052
  3. Tuckson RV, Edmunds M, Hodgkins ML. Telehealth. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(16):1585-1592. doi:10.1056/NEJMsr1503323
  4. Nouri SS, Adler-Milstein J, Thao C, Lyles CR. Factors associated with need for more telemedicine support among safety net clinic patients with chronic conditions. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(6):e208039. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8039
  5. Piwek L, Ellis DA, Andrews S, Joinson A. The Rise of Consumer Health Wearables: Promises and Barriers. PLoS Med. 2016;13(2):e1001953. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001953
  6. Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):44-56. doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7
  7. Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science. 2019;366(6464):447-453. doi:10.1126/science.aax2342
  8. Torous J, Andersson G, Bertagnoli A, Christensen H, Cuijpers P, Firth J, Haim A, et al. Towards a consensus around standards for smartphone apps and digital mental health. World Psychiatry. 2019;18(1):97-98. doi:10.1002/wps.20592

Comments